So, I'm sitting here watching Game 4 of the NBA Finals and realized, "Hey, I haven't blogged in forever." So I have a confession to make. When I blogged it used to be on company time. If I had a couple of down hours I could whip one of these out between taking depositions and answering discovery. Between a 7 month kid and a new job where I have very little down time and am in court all the time it's been tough. But, don't get me wrong I've wanted to be here a lot. I've had a lot to say too. So I'll continue to try to make it out here, but it just hasn't been easy.
Speaking of Game 4 of the NBA Finals, how about these finals? I think I love nothing better thus far than the crazy pendulum swing of opinions by the ESPN 24 hour talking head news cycle. You would've thought they learned their lesson in the Indiana-Miami series where no one won a back to back game. Here's a piece of advice, ESPN Analyst Guy, momentum means jackshit between games. Unless a team is grossly outmatched (see: Miami v. Milwaukee) what happened in the preceding games does not carry over to the next game. Injuries aside, of course. The Spurs hitting 16 3 pointers will not carry over the the next game just like San Antonio turning the ball over 17 times and Tim Duncan looking every bit his 37 years of age didn't carry over. I heard all yesterday and today the trouble Miami is in. Asking ESPN "experts" on the Daily Dime what trouble Miami was in: "somewhat" or "major" not a single one of the 5 scoffed at the question and everyone one of them said Miami was in some kind of trouble. That just a complete lack of comprehension about A) 7 game series, and B) The Miami Heat the last 3 years. It should be no surprise to anyone paying attention that Miami is winning heading into the fourth quarter and that they have been generally playing better tonight.
You know when a team is actually "somewhat" in trouble in a 7 game series? When they are facing multiple elimination games. That's when you can say a team is in trouble. The defending champs are not in any form of trouble when they are facing a 2-1 deficit in a 7 game series and haven't lost back to back games in months. Especially when we are talking about the Heat. This team is one of the more enigmatic teams in league history.
Oh look, Miami won.
Their win tonight aside, Miami can't exactly be considered one of the more dominant teams in league history and if this series has proved anything its that LeBron isn't anything close to Michael Jordan. He may be the best player right now, but i still have a hard time believing I'll ever judge him greater than Jordan, Bird, Magic, Russell, or maybe even Tim Duncan, among others. More on LeBron, later. Remember when Miami ripped off that 27 game winning streak and we were talking about where this team would rank all time. I wouldn't know where to put it without running through a brilliant survey of a top ten all time list provided by Bill Simmons (who else?). This comes straight from his Book of Basketball. If you havent read it, and love the game of basketball, you have to get it. Easiest 700 page read ever. Before we get there, some key stats from this Miami Heat team giving them the benefit of the doubt by giving them the title and wins in Game 5 and Game 6 (which I don't believe will happen)
66-16 regular season, 16-6 playoffs, 37-4 at home, +7.9 regular season scoring difference, 7.4 playoffs (through game 4 of the Finals), 1st in regular season FG% by 1.5%, tied for first in points per possession, and generally rank in the top 10 in just about every team stat kept by ESPN for the regular season. Now onto the elite 10 according to Simmons, top to bottom:
1. '86 Celtics (shocker Simmons grades his hometown Celtics the best team ever). Some cherry-picked stats from that team: 67-15 regular season, 15-3 playoff record. A ridiculous 40-1 at home. Winning streaks of 14 and 13. +9.4 scoring difference regular season, +10.6 in the playoffs. Won title in 6. Swept Jordan's Bulls when he went for 49 in Game 1 and 63 in Game 2, nearly swept the Hawks with Dominque Wilins the MVP runner-up at the helm, swept a 57-win Milwaukee Bucks team in the finals.
This team had Larry Bird, Kevin McHale, Robert Parish, Dennis Johnson, the legendary Bill Walton, and Danny Ainge among others. From just a talent level this team is more complete than this year's Heat. And look, I will be the first to tell you cross generational comparisons are tough. The league was much more physical and interior oriented in the 80s and 90s, whereas in the 10s you need a stud point guard and as many three point shooters as you can cram onto the court without your defense suffering. But we've seen old-school teams succeed in this era like the Bulls and the Pacers and the Grizzlies so the comparisons still aren't too tough. I don't think he need to go any further, Miami just isn't the best team of all time. Not after that 7 game series against Indiana.
2. '96 Bulls (come on Simmons, you were reaching when you belittled the 72 wins). 72-10 (best all time) regular season record, 39-2 at home, 12.3 regular season scoring difference, 1st in PPG regular season, 2 in PPG allowed regular season, only 2 double digit losses (fewest ever), 15-3 playoffs, 10-0 at home, 10.6 scoring difference in playoffs.
I understand the diluted league argument with Vancouver and Toronto joining the league that year, but come on, the fact that Jordan and Pippen were well past their prime and that's when they won 72? You know what a 33 year old Dwyane Wade and a 30 year old LeBron would do in this league? 60. At best. It still takes talent, chemistry, and a little luck to win 72 when your best players are all in their 30s. But mostly it takes talent and grit. The NBA suffers now what the NBA suffered in 1996: a diluted league. 8 teams finished under 30 wins this year. We could contract Orlando, Sacramento (sorry, hometowners), Charlotte, and Toronto and it still probably wouldn't be enough to make the league as competitive as MLB or the NFL. despite playing in a diluted league, with the best player in the universe in his prime, in a conference where the 8th seed was 6 games below .500, and boasting a 27 game winning streak, Miami missed it by 6 games. Diluted league or not 72 wins plus the fact they were defending their 5th title in 7 years is very impressive. This Miami team with its collective lack of focus couldn't hold a candle to what these past their prime Bulls did in 1996.
3. '87 Lakers. 65-17, 37-4 at home, +9.3 regular season, 15-3 playoffs, +11.4 playoffs.
This team had Magic, Kareem, and James Worthy, three of the best Lakers ever, which is saying a lot considering they also have had Kobe,Shaq, Elgin, and The Logo. I think the important fact dropped by Simmons from this team is this: They mastered the art of juggling transition and half-court offense..." That's something Miami wishes they could say. They got better this year in the half court with their expanding roster of 3 point shooters, but when they play anybody good their half-court offense is mediocre at best. It's been that way since the beginning in 2011. Compare versus the Spurs and Pacers who thrive in half-court offense. Sure transition comes easy against bad teams, but against good careful teams, transition is harder to come by making set offenses and traditional basketball more important. Miami just doesn't have it. Also something interesting you see from these previous three teams: 15-3 playoffs. Miami will never do something like that. Either a lack of focus or lack of talent causes them to struggle. I think its a little of both, but it has to be an indictment that when things get tough come playoff time they go into a shell. They are good enough to win because they have the best player in the world on the floor, but as a team they just aren't as dominant in the playoffs because their overall talent level doesn't compare to these deeper and more legendary teams.
4. '89 Pistons. 63-19, 37-4 at home. +5.8 scoring difference regular season, 15-2 playoffs, +9.5 scoring difference playoffs.
This was the break through team for Isiah and a very deep team with Dumars, Rodman, Laimbeer, and Vinnie Johnson. This was actually one of the first basketball teams I remember because they lost the '88 Finals to the Lakers in 7 the year the Mavericks took that same Lakers team to 7 in the Western Conference Finals, which was also my first live basketball experience. Again another versatile transition/half-court offense team with one of the hardest-nosed defenses in league history. You just wanted to shank Laimbeer every time you looked at him. You know how LeBron gets frustrated by physical play? He wouldn't have survived a series against the Bad Boy Pistons. Neither would Wade. They claim exhaustion in Game 1 of the NBA Finals this year? By Game 4 of any series with this Pistons team they'd cry Uncle. Moving on.
5. '01 Lakers. 56-26, +3.4 scoring difference regular season, 15-1 playoffs, +12.8 scoring difference playoffs, only loss in OT in NBA Finals, Game 1
This really could have been higher on this list if they didn't go through the motions in the regular season. But when the chips were down in the playoffs, holy shit this team was unstoppable. You've never seen an inside out combo like 2001 Kobe and Shaq. Some fun combined playoff stats when they actually brought it:
59.8 PPG, 22.7 RPG, 9.3 APG. That's damn near a 30-11-5 player. Twice. Good God. If they weren't at each other's throats and Kobe wasn't a little shithead back then a in his prime Shaq and in his prime Kobe could have dominated for YEARS. We wouldn't even be talking about a Spurs semi-dynasty with them going for their 5th title in 14 years. We'd be talking about how Kobe has 8 rings. Woulda coulda shoulda. But if you think this Heat team was doing anything to stop Shaq, you're full of it.
6. '97 Bulls. 69-13. 39-2 at home, +10.8 scoring difference regular season, 15-4 playoffs, +5.5 playoffs.
I'm going to spend very little time here. Basically Jordan and Pippen were a year older from that '96 team. They still won the 3rd most games ever in the regular season and they added a still good Rodman to a bunch of quality role players. Jordan has the killer instinct alone that the entire Heat team lacks. Even at 34 I'd take him over 28 year old LeBron James to lead my team to a title.
I'm going to skip past 7-9. It's the '71 Bucks, '83 76ers, and '72 Lakers. Just a very very different era and one I know far less about. I will say it involved an in prime Kareem, a better than Dwyane Wade Oscar Robertson, Moses Malone, Doctor J, The Logo, Wilt Chamberlain, and Gail Goodrich. All incredible players and that '72 Lakers team did win 33 in a row. I'm not ready to put this Heat team there.
10. '91 Bulls. 61-21, 35-6, +9.0 regular season, 15-2 playoffs, +11.7 playoffs, best Fg% and 2nd FG% defense in the playoffs.
Michael's breakthrough year. Swept the back to back champs and killed the Bad Boy Pistons, beat the Showtime Lakers in 5 in the NBA Finals and ended that story too. Only losses were Game 1 of the NBA Finals and Game 3 against Sir Charles and the Sixers. Otherwise we had the arrival of Michael Jordan and Scottie Pippen and Phil Jackson. This was a huge turning point in NBA history. We would watch the greatest 8 year stretch of any team since the Celtics of the 60s. I'm not convinced Miami would beat this team.
Something else you notice looking through that list: only the '96 Bulls saw their scoring difference drop in the playoffs and it was still double digits. The Heat's +7 differential is quality but you just do not see them turn it on in the playoffs the way these great teams did. Even if the Heat win the next two games, I just struggle a way to put this team in the Top 10 Hall of Fame. The streak was great and certainly will be remembered throughout history, but the legendary status of this team was lost in these last two playoff series and in the collective nonchalant way this team conducts itself. I would likely take all 10 of those teams above this particular Heat team.
This isn't to say this was not a great season and a very good team. Because they are. Anytime they are counted out, or the vultures are circling they come alive. Just as they did tonight. They show the heart of a champion, but so have so many other teams in the NBA. It's not enough to show the heart of a champion to be considered among the all-time greats, but you have to rip out the heart of your opponent too. Miami just doesn't have that killer instinct in them. It's beyond them. They have to play bad to self-motivate to play well. Greatest teams of all time don't do that.
Part 2 with a way too early look at LeBron's legacy coming soon!
Thursday, June 13, 2013
Friday, April 26, 2013
NFL Draft 1st Round Analysis
So I took a hiatus from this blog for a number of personal reasons, but I have been getting that itch and I'm back. I think actually watching 3 and half hours of the draft triggered my desire to get back on here. Mostly because the NFL Draft is actually really boring and you have a lot of time to think about the picks, the process, and whether or not Chris Berman has had a stroke recently or why Mel Kiper, Jr. doesn't shape his hair differently since he is going more bald on the right side of his head than the left side. Honestly, Gruden is the only one I can stand on there which is no surprise since he's the only qualified guy to be there offering draft analysis. Mel Kiper, Jr. basically made his own career by being a scout nerd after high school and eventually wormed his way into the career he has by essentially being the first one there. Not to take away his entrepreneurial acumen in turning his hobby and passion into a niche career in his early 20s but he's not a personnel guy. An exchange I really liked was Gruden making the case for Tyrann Mathieu in round 1 and Kiper rolling his eyes at him. But Gruden zinged him in the end with a reference to Janoris Jenkins, a former Gator and as checkered a drug past as the Honey Badger, drafted by the Rams in the first round because of his talent and having a great rookie season. All Kiper could say was, well let's see how he does in the next years since one season doesn't make a career.
And that's where I think the problem lies in what Kiper does. He has incomplete information and considers more irrelevant things over relevant things on a number of occasions. Lastly, I think he fails to check himself on what the draft is really about: getting the best talent on your team. And talent often exceeds things like failed drug tests, short arms for a LT, a 4.6 40 for a WR, a 6'0" quarterback. It's easy to take risks on these things if they have talent, because they will find a way. If they don't then so what, there is 6 more rounds to this draft and another draft in one short year. For a variety of reasons sure thing first rounders flame out all the time and GMs understand this better than Kiper. You can't possibly hit home runs every time in the first round, so why not just do the sensible thing and get the most talent you can. I loved Gruden's comment on Mathieu for that very reason. He understands the process. If he flames out, then so what, hes just one of hundreds of draft picks that will flame out. But he has the talent to be an actual game changer, not just another cog in the machine, and that kind of talent is rare in the draft.
A couple more things before I get to my own analysis. I never watch the combine unlike my good friend fellow blogger Mr. Armchair. He uses it for his mock draft which you'll find here. I feel like the combine is some goofy thing started out as a well conceived idea but is now done just for the sake of itself. Gruden kind of alluded to it a little bit when they were talking about Chance Warmack and his 40 yard dash. What the hell is the point of a 40 yard dash for a guard? Actually that takes me to the 40 yard dash in general, with the exception of defensive backs, wide receivers, and running backs, it's totally meaningless and even for those players its not really that important. Why are we clocking 40 yard dashes for middle linebackers who spend more time moving laterally than vertically? Or even speed pass rushers who run 15 yards at most at a time. The 40 yard dash is completely ridiculous except for those specialty players that would actually use it. It's more like a game now than any kind of measurable skill for football players. Same goes for generally everything else. The bench press cracks me up too. The next time someone's ability to bench press 225 pounds 21 straight times projects them to be a great football player will probably be the first time. The Cowboys drafted a "strong" lineman with their first round pick, who also apparently cant move that well. Being a lineman is as much about technique and IQ than it is about brute strength.
Which takes me to my last point. Why is it so hard to grade these players solely on their body of work instead? Besides the interviews, which I think can be important if used right to determine whether the kid is a football player and not just an athlete and not as a means to ferret out homosexuals I think the combine just muddles the picture. The video shows what these kids can do in a football setting, not in a gym setting. I loved Russell Wilson in college. If I got a good NC State line I'd bet on them almost all the time solely because of the kid's talent. The same was true of Drew Brees. These kid were just plain good on mediocre teams in big time conferences. But they were short, so they didn't go in the 1st round, because somehow their ability to throw over bigger linemen in college wouldn't translate to the pros. Meanwhile Drew Brees, even before getting in the video game offense of Sean Payton, was a very good QB for the Chargers and Russell Wilson only took the Seahawks to the playoffs in his rookie season getting better and better as the season went on showing his innate talent and ability to learn and be a football player.
With all of these things in mind I make my draft grades based not entirely on what I think the player will do in his career since that's simply impossible to judge unless his name is Peyton Manning or Andrew Luck, but also on the process the team made, who they passed up, my perceived needs for the team, and whether Jerry Jones was involved in the process.
Pick 1 - Kansas City Chiefs - Eric Fisher OT, Central Michigan Grade: C
That's a telltale sign this draft class lacked any franchise players. I didn't even know who this guy was before the draft season. Like the Jets, the Chiefs are trying to stem some attrition here with Branden Albert leaving. Basically you replace a good not great NFL left tackle with a prospect that projects to be a good not great left tackle. Sweet you're really going places with this first overall pick. It fills a need on the line and he is supposedly one of the best prospects this year so I guess that's fine, but they better spend the draft pick they are getting for Albert on something good as well as the dollars they are trying to save by not signing Albert.
Pick 2 - Jacksonville Jaguars - Luke Joeckel OT, Texas A&M Grade: B
Its hard to complain about this pick even though the Jaguars had the second worst defense in the AFC because they also had the second worst offense in the AFC. There's no QB to take here and they didn't pull the trigger on any number of serviceable QBs to plug the hole this season until the 2014 draft so I guess you set yourself up down the road with a good lineman. I still think they should have gone defense here.
Pick 3 - Miami Dolphins (from Oakland Raiders)- Dion Jordan OLB, Oregon Grade: F
Ok so there were two funny things that happened around this time. The first was after the Dolphins completed the trade every analyst on TV was high fiving each other over calling the fact that Miami was going to move up to take Lane Johnson about 20 seconds before Miami took Dion Jordan. That was awesome. As always, these fools get paid money to be as right about sports as I am who does it for free. Why it was especially funny was that the Dolphins are inches from acquiring Brendan Albert for the next half decade to play left tackle. They may have tabled the deal but it's done. Good job talking heads.
Part 2 of the funny episode was Miami actually taking Dion Jordan with the 3rd pick. I think this officially signals the jumping of the shark moment of the "you must have pass rushers" mentality on defense. Whoever said it on ESPN was right (and I think it was Gruden, of course), Oregon plays hockey lines on defense. Its the strategy you use when you have mediocre talent on defense. Why play one guy the whole game who will play 90% speed to pace himself, when you have 2 guys of equal caliber who will go 110% because they only play 40-50% of the defensive snaps. If Dion Jordan was actually any good and not just a workout warrior (4.6 40) he would've been on the field more for the oft-challenged Oregon defense. Anytime you can get the equivalent of a good middle reliever in baseball with the 3rd overall pick you just have to do it. If you can give up your mid 2nd rounder to in the process even better. Way to go Miami.
Pick 4 - Philadelphia Eagles - Lane Johnson OT, Oklahoma Grade: B+
I like this pick. I think he is a great fit here and the only thing holding me back from an A was the fact that the defense is horrible on this team and well Lane Johnson doesn't tackle or cover anyone. But if you have Vick back there for another go around you might as well let him stand upright as long as possible since he is still talented and the Eagles went to total shit when the O-line fell apart from injuries. Prior to that they were only partial shit thanks tot he defense. Seems to be where they find themselves now pending these next few rounds.
Pick 5 - Detroit Lions - Ezekiel Ansah DE/OLB, BYU Grade: D
Look this pick may pan out 3 years down the road, and I will be honest I was impressed by his sheer athleticism and domination in some games last year, but the dude is clearly raw and unlike someone like Aldon Smith who had the privilege of joining a great defense with players like Patrick Willis and Justin Smith, Ezekiel Ansah is supported by a couple of bad news bear DTs and thats about it. He may make waves year 1, but I doubt it, and with Jim Schwartz on the hot seat, this is a project player that may fall by wayside when his coach leaves. I just think there were more polished defensive players that could better help the Lions in that spot.
Pick 6 - Cleveland Browns - Barkevious Mingo DE, LSU Grade: B-
Speak of the devil, a more polished destructive defensive force than Ansah went exactly one pick later. This grade isn't for the player, I watch a lot of SEC football and I like Mingo. I think he has a good future in the NFL. I just really wished the Browns took Tavon Austin. That was the player they needed to really spark some interest in this new regime in Cleveland. Tavon Austin strikes me as one of the very few game changers in this draft. No one would even have made Geno Smith a possible 1st rounder if he didn't have Tavon Austin who took so many short passes for hug gains. The Browns did fine here, but I think this was the case where they could've hit a home run and given the Browns fans a second explosive playmaker along side Richardson. At the very least they would've sold more jerseys.
Pick 7 - Arizona Cardinals - Jonathan Cooper OG, North Carolina Grade: A
This was the right pick for the right team at the right time. Cooper grades as probably one of the safest linemen in the draft along with Lane Johnson and even though guards are supposedly less valuable in the draft, take it from a fan of team that had zero interior line play they are just as important. If the Cowboys traded up this was the player I hoped they got. Things are looking up in Arizona.
Pick 8 - St. Louis (from Buffalo Bills) - Tavon Austin WR, West Virginia Grade: A-
Gotta get your guy. Maybe the grade should be an A, because this was the case of a perfect fit. That Rams defense has come to life under Jeff Fisher and with Amendola gone they needed his replacement bad. Amendola is a fine if fragile player, but Austin is a real talent. I wouldn't go so far as to compare him to Percy Harvin yet, and maybe that's why I give it an A-. What makes Harvin so great is how surprisingly strong he is for his size. He takes square hits and keeps going. Austin never really takes square hits. I just wonder how well his elusiveness will translate from the Big East/Big 12 to the NFL. But that's nitpicking I like this pick a lot.
Pick 9 - New York Jets - Dee Milliner CB, Alabama Grade: D
Basically the Jets are making up for self-imposed attrition when they dumped Revis. They are no better for this pick. Of course they did get #13 so we'll explore that further, but really CB wasn't a problem with Revis out. Cromartie had one of his best seasons ever and the Jets needed so many other things. Also, I don't think that highly of Milliner. Kiper was right to point out his lack of ball skills although his phrase "miss an interception on first down, touchdown on second down" is downright retarded. In fact the highlights ESPN showed of Milliner after he was picked highlighted his lack of ball skills. He is a good cover corner I guess, but I was never that impressed by him.
Pick 10 - Tennessee Titans - Chance Warmack OG, Alabama Grade: A
Having been an owner of Chris Johnson I could tell you O-Linemen and especially run blocking O-linemen were heavily needed by the Titans. I love this pick. I saw some mocks that had Warmack in the 20s for whatever reason. He wasn't getting by Dallas at 18. This fool is a mauler and already combo blocks liek a man. Youll never hear about him in the NFL unless he makes the Pro Bowl but for O-linemen that's the way it should be if you're good.
Pick 11 - San Diego Chargers - D.J. Fluker OT, Alabama Grade: A
Here's what I wrote to my Charger fan friends on facebook: How you can tell AJ Smith is no longer in charge of the Chargers: They didn't select an OLB with their first round pick.
The new regime in San Diego got off to a solid start with this pick. They didn't get fancy or cute. They took the best available player at the highest position of need. Good work.
Pick 12 - Oakland Raiders - D.J. Hayden CB, Houston Grade: C
I'll be honest I don't know much about the kid other than he miraculously survived some weird heart injury. What I do know is this wasn't a super strong CB class, certainly not enough to take the 2nd one at 12. I would've liked to see some defensive front seven help. I gave them a C because at least they traded out of 3 and got another 2nd rounder out of the deal. But it just still seems to me that the Raiders have a unique way of going about the draft that just has not worked out the past decade.
Pick 13 - New York Jets (from Tampa Bay Buccaneers) - Sheldon Richardson DT, Missouri Grade: F
Not an indictment of Sheldon Richardson whom I know very little about. This is mostly what you traded Darrelle Revis for. There is no DT in the game today that impacts a game like Revis. Obtaining this pick to take Richardson was horrible. Rob Ryan we'll see you on ESPN in 2014.
Pick 14 - Carolina Panthers - Star Lotululei DT, Utah Grade: C
Well the Panthers certainly did pick on the right side of the ball, but I feel like they could've made a bigger impact with a different player. They are stuck in a conference with Drew Brees and Matt Ryan for at least the next few years and the Panthers have a garbage secondary. Not a terrible pick and they probably tried but I would've like them to trade out of this spot.
Pick 15 - New Orleans - Kenny Vaccaro S, Texas Grade: C
Personal philosophy here: There are three positions you shouldnt take in the first round: Kicker, Punter, and Safety. I feel like besides DT, safety is the least technical position on the field. Every safety drafted high in the last 5 years should send 10% of their paycheck to Troy Polamalu who revolutionized the playmaking safety. But really besides him and Ed Reed you're hard pressed to even name another good safety in the league. I can at least name three DTs immediately offhand: Suh, Ngata, Wilfork. New Orleans had so many holes and there were players at this point better suited than Vaccaro to help immediately.
Pick 16 - Buffalo Bills - E.J. Manuel QB, Florida State Grade: B-
I don't hate this pick as much as some especially given that they could've either taken him 8th or traded down got an extra second rounder and still got Manuel at 16th. That was excellent. The problem is when you take a QB in the 1st round it puts so much pressure on him and the organization to make it work and when you dont have as high of a pedigree as say Andrew Luck or Matt Ryan the odds of failure are so high. I feel like Buffalo could've traded down to 16 taken any other player and still got Manuel at 41. AT thatpoint he becomes a "QB in waiting" not an immediate franchise QB. Do I think Manuel can have a career in the NFL? Sure. Do I think he's Buffalo's franchise QB? No, but at least Buffalo got more than just Manuel with their first round pick.
Pick 17 - Pittsburgh Steelers - Jarvis Jones OLB, Georgia Grade: A+
Unbelievable. This is why the combine (or in Jones' case, pro day) is stupid. If you watched just a handful of Jarvis Jones games this year you saw a sure fire NFL talent. Then he has a bad 40 time and now he falls. Tell me the next time Jarvis Jones' 40 yard dash helps him sack a QB. He had 28 sacks the last two years in the SEC. He is a football player and I thought that's what we are drafting in this exhibition. Here is a list of teams above I think would've done better to draft Jones than whoever they drafted: Dolphins, Eagles, Lions, Jets, Jets again, Raiders, Panthers, Saints. Jarvis Jones was a top 5-10 pick for sure until that 40 time came out which is ridiculous. Now he gets to learn from one of the professional defensive units in the NFL and as usual the Steelers somehow get their player. I'll bet the second Jones slid past the Raiders, Jets, Panthers, and Saints, everyone in Pittsburgh's war room was popping champagne bottles.
Pick 18 - San Francisco (from Dallas Cowboys) - Eric Reid S, LSU Grade: B+
San Francisco has a million picks and very few needs so trading up made sense. Given that they only gave up some 70 something pick to move up 13 spots in the 1st round is why they get a B+. I actually don't like the pick that much. First, he's a safety. Second, he's more of a SS which a team like San Francisco really doesn't require. Third, he got burned a bit in pass coverage at LSU which was his predecessor Deshon Goldson's specialty last year. I agree with Mr. Armchair, I think shoring up the pass rush was the way to go with this luxury pick. Justin Smith is not young and when he went down the pass rush stopped.
Pick 19 - New York Giants - Justin Pugh OT/OG, Syracuse Grade: A-
This was kind of a weird spot for the Giants to be in with who was off the board, and I liked the pick. This also made me laugh because Gruden loved the pick but Kiper had to say he has short arms for LT like 3 times. Who fucking cares? For one thing, I'm sure the Giants were not picking their franchise LT with this pick. Their O-line was thin and older and they needed a lineman that had some versatility. For another thing, since when does long arms translate to success? I'd rather a lineman have T-rex arms and a great base and foot work, than be Stretch Armstrong and get abused by multiple rush techniques. Kiper just doesn't get it sometimes. Why the A- then? With Osi gone, I thought this was a great spot for Bjoern Werner. He's a good talent and might need some work but Tuck and JPP could make him great. Too bad for Werner.
Pick 20 - Chicago Bears - Kyle Long OG, Oregon Grade: D
Another Oregon prospect who has little experience at his position compared to his peers. The Bears were in need of something a little more polished than Long. While Gruden and Kiper were talking about his inexperience and weaknesses, the ESPN highlights showed me a guy who did look lost and out of place at his position. I don't want to predict busts because it's too hard, but if I did, he would certainly make the Round 1 list.
Pick 21 - Cincinnati Bengals - Tyler Eifert TE, Notre Dame Grade: D
Ok, if you played fantasy football the last three years, as part of your draft prep you probably looked at Jermaine Gresham and thought, hey here is a talented guy I can get on the cheap at TE. And then you get him and he's just kinda average and you either platoon him or drop him outright. You know why? It's not his talent, it's his usage pattern. Look up some 2012 fantasy outlooks on Jermaine Gresham's usage pattern and why he's not a 900/8 TE for your fantasy team and you'll understand what I mean. Given that little nugget of information why am I now supposed to get excited about Cincinnati having two great pass catching TEs? This seems like a terrible fit for the Bengals and probably would've been better off reaching for Cordarrelle Patterson or Justin Hunter instead.
Pick 22 - Atlanta Falcons (From St. Louis through Washington) - Desmond Trufant CB, Washington Grade: C-
I think this pick works out for Atlanta as I think with the right coaching Trufant could be as good as his brother. They have the same set of skills. Why I dump on this pick? Atlanta has a need for picks at this point and was Desmond Trufant really getting picked before 30? Now they are without their third and sixth this year on the heels of losing their 2012 first and fourth from that Julio Jones trade.
Pick 23 - Minnesota Vikings - Sharrif Floyd DT, Florida Grade: A
Ok, so I'm glad we finally got to him. I probably watched more total Florida games than most of these mock draft experts and I couldn't figure out why Floyd was a top 3 pick. Floyd is a good player and he was a disruptive force a good defense, but this is not a game changing player in my opinion. He a good piece of a good line. I think he got picked exactly where he should've gone and he'll help out Minnesota on the interior of that line. But if someone took him top 3, then they wasted their pick.
Pick 24 - Indianapolis Colts - Bjoern Werner DE, Florida State Grade: B+
I like Werner and think he has a good future ahead of him, but I was hoping that a player like him went to a more veteran and talented D-Line than this one like San Francisco or New York. I have confidence that Werner will work hard and really try to improve but he is fairly raw. That said, Indy could've done worse with this pick. Eddie Lacy would've been an intriguing pick here too.
Pick 25 - Minnesota Vikings (from Seattle Seahawks) - Xavier Rhodes CB, Florida State Grade: D
Yeah Rhodes will be a fine player too I think, but you just traded one of the most dynamic all purpose players in the league in his prime for Rhodes. Whether Harvin was having migraines or causing them with the coaching staff he is worth way more than this pick. As New York learned this was not a draft you wanted to stockpile picks in.
Pick 26 - Green Bay Packers - Datone Jones DE, UCLA, Grade: B
Jones is a good player and I think has a good ceiling, better than that of say Tank Carradine who is still on the board. A lot of people wanted Eddie Lacy here but I think Green Bay did a good job addressing the more pressing need than the sexy pick. Green Bay hasn't fallen flat in the playoffs the last two years because of their offense. It's been their defense.
Pick 27 - Houston Texans - DeAndre Hopkins WR, Clemson, Grade: A
I love this pick. I didn't think Hopkins was getting his due and compared to Patterson or Hunter I think he is way more polished. It's a better fit on a Houston team that's window is now, not 3 years from now and this was clearly the most pressing need for this team.
Pick 28 - Denver Broncos - Sylvester Williams DT, North Carolina, Grade: A
This was a plug and play pick that is at just the right spot for the Broncos at 28. They had to have a starter on defense that could help shore up their D-line. Even with Dumervil gone, the Broncos pass rush will be fine and DT was one of the more pressing needs. A solid pick from a franchise that usually does the right things in the draft.
Pick 29 - Minnesota Vikings (from New England Patriots) - Cordarrelle Patterson WR, Tennessee Grade: F
Sold the farm in mid round picks for this guy. I hope he's worth 2 or 3 prospective starters 3 years from now, because he sure isn't worth anything now. I hated this move. If you want to take a project or an unsure thing at WR why not just hold your picks and get Keenan Allen or Robert Woods. Despite some flaws they were both way mroe productive in college than this guy was.
Pick 30 - St. Louis Rams (from Atlanta Falcons) - Alec Ogletree ILB, Georgia Grade: B
This is a good player with a very checkered past. He also forms one of the bonuses the Rams ended up with for trading out of #2 last year. I think I would've liked the Rams to maybe even double down at WR on this pick. It's not like they have any real talent there, even though they did spend an early second rounder on Brian Quick and their early first rounder this year on Austin. But all in all a solid pick assuming his talent shines through his issues.
Pick 31 - Dallas Cowboys (from San Francisco 49ers) - Travis Frederick C, Wisconsin Grade: F
It's hard for me to grade a team bad for trading back when they had no obvious pick at their former spot. When Jarvis Jones went off I wanted Dallas to trade back. And they did! Getting almost no compensation for dropping 13 spots in the first round. Ok fine, maybe the mid 3rd rounder will be a good safety or guard or something. But then to drop this steaming pile on me in the first round is ridiculous. Even the kid himself says he's probably not a first round pick. What the hell? Even against my own personal policy I would've rather had Matt Elam at safety in the 31st pick than this huge dude who can't move, which by the way is a bad trait for a center who often has to go second level. Sigh. Hopefully we are all wrong but given Jerry Jones' talent evaluation lately we probably aren't.
Pick 32 - Baltimore Ravens - Matt Elam S, Florida Grade: A-
Yeah yeah it's a safety in the first round but its the last pick of the first round and huge need for Baltimore. Plus Matt Elam is really good, better than Vaccaro I would say. It was a solid pick I wished the Cowboys made one pick earlier.
A brief word on Geno Smith and Manti Te'o:
Geno Smith was never a first round QB. That guy is a system QB (credit: Dana Holgorsen) from a system that hasn't exactly produced good pro QBs yet (see: Case Keenum and Brandon Weedon). Why he ever accepted an invitation to the draft is beyond me, he had to know he wasn't getting selected in the first round after all the QB movement this offseason.
Manti smartly declined for more than publicity reasons. He knew he was falling out of the first round and rightly so. Reason #325 why you can't take Kiper that seriously is he had Manti at like #17 on his board. First he plays MLB, a position of increasing unimportance in the NFL. Case in point was Ogletree, taken at #30 as the only ILB taken in the first round. Then there is the performance issues. He got straight up abused by a junior NFL team. That had to raise serious questions about his abilities to actually play at the NFL level. Lastly is that whole hoax thing. Even though it has mostly blown over, it wont ever blow over and he seems to be genuinely shaken by it. Do you want to invest a first rounder in a emotional kid who is going to hear nothing but taunts about that for the rest of his NFL career from both fans and players. I'll bet whoever gets him, most players on that team wont even want him. He's not as talented as people think and now he's damaged goods.
It's good to be back! Enjoy the rest of the draft and making fun of my 'Boys. I certainly will.
Friday, December 21, 2012
Unwritten Law and Week 16 Supercontest
We hear about the unwritten law all the time. In sports it's especially prevalent. There is this romantic notion that all sports are governed not only by the written rule, but by some preconceived notion of gentlemanly conduct to goes beyond the scope of the rule book. A specific example I often laugh at is in baseball or its derivative in old man softball: taking the extra base. In baseball if you are leading 11-2 in the 8th inning it's frowned upon for you, as a member of the team winning, to steal bases, especially 3rd base. In my adult baseball league this came up as my team was crushing the other team and our fastest guy stole 3rd. He's just trying to play the game hard and the other team takes offense. In old man softball it becomes a take a single base scenario even though your hit would have landed you at 2nd, 3rd, or even home. For some reason not taking the extra-base is sportsmanship or something. Both teams are on the field, and both teams should be expected to play hard. If I was getting thrashed I'd take it as more of an insult if the other team just stopped playing hard. It makes a statement like 'yeah we are so good we don't even need to really play the game hard anymore'. If a team gets upset because the other team, despite winning handily, plays hard then they can just take the cowardly way out and walk off the field. But while both teams are on the field, both teams should be expected to play hard.
For professional sports that should be even more strictly followed. People pay to watch the pros pay. They don't pay to watch one team quit and the other team ease off the brakes. This is why I find it ridiculous that Pete Carroll even felt it necessary to give some half-assed, sarcastic apology after running a fake punt in his teams 50-17 win over Buffalo. Or getting questions about Matt Flynn throwing into the end zone in a 58-0 drubbing of the Cardinals. These guys are professionals and they should act like, on both sidelines. You don't want them running up the score? Well stop them. Hit their QB hard, pick off passes, make defensive stands. Do something on the field to show you have a sense of pride. Don't cry like a bitch after the game because a team ran up the score on you because you didn't do anything on the field to stop them.
We are at the stage of the NFL season that we run into that problem. Only 16 of the 32 teams are even playing for the postseason at this point. We get a lot of Pro Bowl effort on defense, and experimentation on offense, and as a result we get some teams just running up the score like Seattle has done two weeks in a row. It's simple: be a professional. Work your craft as diligently as you can. Don't cry when your opponent does that very thing. It disgusts me when athletes and coaches cry about that. With that said let's move on to the picks:
Week 14 Recap
(Ed. Note: Obviously I missed week 15's picks. Unfortunately I was in a wedding as well as being the officiant for the wedding. Prior to that I was the busiest I had ever been at work. Some things just have to take a back seat I guess.)
Ravens @ Redskins (-2.5)
This was an unnecessary back door cover with Kirk Cousins playing the hero. I don't know what happened to spark Baltimore's offense but every now and then the Ravens come up with this game where they look competent on offense. But a cover is a cover no matter how you put it and the way I've been going the last coupel of weeks I need all the ones I can get.
Texans (+3.5) @ Patriots
Holy shit. Crazy ass Patriots. I maybe should have seen this coming. Houston was giving up yards and points to far inferior offenses. Hindsight is 20/20 but the final result was also not out of the realm of easy predictions.
Lions @ Packers (-7)
Yeah the Lions have quit and are back to being the same old Lions. What changed? Nothing really. The Lions were fortunate last year in their wins and regression has taken place. They still have not really cured that defense and that was never more evident than in the Houston come back on Thanksgiving and the Indy come back a few weeks back. No half way decent team loses either of those games.
Falcons (-3.5) @ Panthers
This was a dumb pick and I underestimated Cam's resilience. Despite playing for nothing, Carolina wanted this game for revenge and Atlanta didn't need this game and could take the week off after crushing Drew Brees and essentially winning the division. Kudos to Cam, I give him a lot of shit but he's not a quitter.
Chiefs (+6.5) @ Browns
Romeo only has magic for one game and it looks like his magic has run out. The Chiefs are an absolute mess and rumor is now Crennel and Pioli are gone. The AFC West is ripe for the taking over the next few years so getting a good coach and personnel man in will do wonders for this team. Same for the Browns. Shurmur needs to go and Holmgren is already gone. Both these teams could right the ship really quick. I just wonder which team will do it first.
Week 16 Picks
49ers @ Seahawks (Pk)
Seattle is on an incredible roll and this isn't the same the Russell Wilson San Francisco saw half a season ago. Of course, Colin Kaepernick isn't the same QB Seattle saw either. But Seattle enjoys the best homefield advantage in football and I just get the feeling the 49ers blew their wad on that Patriots game on Sunday Night. The 49ers could easily roll in here and win but I like Seattle's chances at home in this big game. Teh crowd will be rocking and another mini earthquake might be in store if Marshawn busts another one of these: GET OFF ME!!!!!!!!
Man...how do you not get excited watching that. It puts a smile on my face every time I watch it. This game isn't as important as that home game was, but I have a feeling with SF in town it's going to be every bit as crazy in the stadium.
Giants (-2.5) @ Ravens
This the game right here. This is the everyone wrote off New York and left them for dead but somehow they come back game. The Ravens are a mess. Offensively, defensively you name it. Baltimore could be 6-8 right now if not for 4th and 29, a Dan Bailey missed fg, and the Patriots uncharacteristically failing to close out their game. Seriously. The Ravens are only 3 plays from 6-8. Besides, New York loves going on the road in one of these nobody believes in us games.
Redskins (-5.5) @ Eagles
Yes, the Eagles are not the same pushovers they were a few weeks ago when they had totally quit, but in a game of this meaning for Washington and this meaningless for Philly it's hard not to take the fewer than 1 td spread. I think this spread is likely higher with RG3 back, but even if he wasn't Kirk Cousins showed he was more than capable to handle a crap defense like the Eagles'.
Falcons (-3.5) @ Lions
Yeah I know I just lost a Falcons -3.5 line, but here's the deal: Atlanta needs one more win to clinch homefield, Detroit has totally quit (see: last week's Arizona game and also their coaches statements about the team being off the rails again), and Atlanta just put the absolute smackdown on New York. Atlanta has it in them and there is no reason outside of Megatron for this Lions team to even care. I'll go double or nothing on the Falcons here.
Saints (+3) @ Cowboys
I have a bad feeling about this game. Dallas hasn't exactly overwhelmed me on their 3 game winning streak beating a crappy Foles-led Eagles team by 5, going down by 9 to Cincy and needing several dropped interceptions, several dropped AJ Green passes, and a bogus personal foul penalty to win, and then letting Pittsburgh storm back after controlling most of that first half. I still believe Drew Brees has the ability to make people pay (see: 41-0 over Bucs) and he is the last person that would ever quit on his team. Just a bad, bad feeling about this game for my 'Boys. Hope I'm wrong.
Last week: 2-3, Season: 35-29-1 (39-34-1 with bonus)
Good luck to everyone and Merry Christmas or whatever other holiday you may or may not celebrate this week!
For professional sports that should be even more strictly followed. People pay to watch the pros pay. They don't pay to watch one team quit and the other team ease off the brakes. This is why I find it ridiculous that Pete Carroll even felt it necessary to give some half-assed, sarcastic apology after running a fake punt in his teams 50-17 win over Buffalo. Or getting questions about Matt Flynn throwing into the end zone in a 58-0 drubbing of the Cardinals. These guys are professionals and they should act like, on both sidelines. You don't want them running up the score? Well stop them. Hit their QB hard, pick off passes, make defensive stands. Do something on the field to show you have a sense of pride. Don't cry like a bitch after the game because a team ran up the score on you because you didn't do anything on the field to stop them.
We are at the stage of the NFL season that we run into that problem. Only 16 of the 32 teams are even playing for the postseason at this point. We get a lot of Pro Bowl effort on defense, and experimentation on offense, and as a result we get some teams just running up the score like Seattle has done two weeks in a row. It's simple: be a professional. Work your craft as diligently as you can. Don't cry when your opponent does that very thing. It disgusts me when athletes and coaches cry about that. With that said let's move on to the picks:
Week 14 Recap
(Ed. Note: Obviously I missed week 15's picks. Unfortunately I was in a wedding as well as being the officiant for the wedding. Prior to that I was the busiest I had ever been at work. Some things just have to take a back seat I guess.)
Ravens @ Redskins (-2.5)
This was an unnecessary back door cover with Kirk Cousins playing the hero. I don't know what happened to spark Baltimore's offense but every now and then the Ravens come up with this game where they look competent on offense. But a cover is a cover no matter how you put it and the way I've been going the last coupel of weeks I need all the ones I can get.
Texans (+3.5) @ Patriots
Holy shit. Crazy ass Patriots. I maybe should have seen this coming. Houston was giving up yards and points to far inferior offenses. Hindsight is 20/20 but the final result was also not out of the realm of easy predictions.
Lions @ Packers (-7)
Yeah the Lions have quit and are back to being the same old Lions. What changed? Nothing really. The Lions were fortunate last year in their wins and regression has taken place. They still have not really cured that defense and that was never more evident than in the Houston come back on Thanksgiving and the Indy come back a few weeks back. No half way decent team loses either of those games.
Falcons (-3.5) @ Panthers
This was a dumb pick and I underestimated Cam's resilience. Despite playing for nothing, Carolina wanted this game for revenge and Atlanta didn't need this game and could take the week off after crushing Drew Brees and essentially winning the division. Kudos to Cam, I give him a lot of shit but he's not a quitter.
Chiefs (+6.5) @ Browns
Romeo only has magic for one game and it looks like his magic has run out. The Chiefs are an absolute mess and rumor is now Crennel and Pioli are gone. The AFC West is ripe for the taking over the next few years so getting a good coach and personnel man in will do wonders for this team. Same for the Browns. Shurmur needs to go and Holmgren is already gone. Both these teams could right the ship really quick. I just wonder which team will do it first.
Bonus
Jets @ Jaguars (+2.5)
How Mark Sanchez continued to win games is beyond me, but it looks liek his tenure is up. I have no idea what was more shocking: Sanchez only passing for 111 yards against Jacksonville, Sanchez actually winning, Montell Owens running for 6.5 ypc, or Jacksonville losing even though their glorified 4th string running back/fullback ran all over the Jets. What an ugly.
Week 16 Picks
49ers @ Seahawks (Pk)
Seattle is on an incredible roll and this isn't the same the Russell Wilson San Francisco saw half a season ago. Of course, Colin Kaepernick isn't the same QB Seattle saw either. But Seattle enjoys the best homefield advantage in football and I just get the feeling the 49ers blew their wad on that Patriots game on Sunday Night. The 49ers could easily roll in here and win but I like Seattle's chances at home in this big game. Teh crowd will be rocking and another mini earthquake might be in store if Marshawn busts another one of these: GET OFF ME!!!!!!!!
Man...how do you not get excited watching that. It puts a smile on my face every time I watch it. This game isn't as important as that home game was, but I have a feeling with SF in town it's going to be every bit as crazy in the stadium.
Giants (-2.5) @ Ravens
This the game right here. This is the everyone wrote off New York and left them for dead but somehow they come back game. The Ravens are a mess. Offensively, defensively you name it. Baltimore could be 6-8 right now if not for 4th and 29, a Dan Bailey missed fg, and the Patriots uncharacteristically failing to close out their game. Seriously. The Ravens are only 3 plays from 6-8. Besides, New York loves going on the road in one of these nobody believes in us games.
Redskins (-5.5) @ Eagles
Yes, the Eagles are not the same pushovers they were a few weeks ago when they had totally quit, but in a game of this meaning for Washington and this meaningless for Philly it's hard not to take the fewer than 1 td spread. I think this spread is likely higher with RG3 back, but even if he wasn't Kirk Cousins showed he was more than capable to handle a crap defense like the Eagles'.
Falcons (-3.5) @ Lions
Yeah I know I just lost a Falcons -3.5 line, but here's the deal: Atlanta needs one more win to clinch homefield, Detroit has totally quit (see: last week's Arizona game and also their coaches statements about the team being off the rails again), and Atlanta just put the absolute smackdown on New York. Atlanta has it in them and there is no reason outside of Megatron for this Lions team to even care. I'll go double or nothing on the Falcons here.
Saints (+3) @ Cowboys
I have a bad feeling about this game. Dallas hasn't exactly overwhelmed me on their 3 game winning streak beating a crappy Foles-led Eagles team by 5, going down by 9 to Cincy and needing several dropped interceptions, several dropped AJ Green passes, and a bogus personal foul penalty to win, and then letting Pittsburgh storm back after controlling most of that first half. I still believe Drew Brees has the ability to make people pay (see: 41-0 over Bucs) and he is the last person that would ever quit on his team. Just a bad, bad feeling about this game for my 'Boys. Hope I'm wrong.
Last week: 2-3, Season: 35-29-1 (39-34-1 with bonus)
Good luck to everyone and Merry Christmas or whatever other holiday you may or may not celebrate this week!
Friday, December 7, 2012
Lukewarm Stove and Supercontest Week 14
Baseball's winter meetings are an ingenious way to put baseball in the spotlight when the season is still 4-5 months away. Very few things interest sports fans off the field but two really stand out: NFL Draft and baseball's winter meetings. The NBA draft is a far distant third from the other two offseason bonanzas due to the fact there is hardly any interesting talent that slips beyond the 15th pick and there are about 152 trades per draft so you have no idea where everyone will eventually end up. But baseball's winter meetings are such a neat idea. Executives from all 30 teams come and meet in one spot and basically spend the 4 days trying to completely reorganize their roster with the other 29 teams as captive audiences. It would be awesome to be a part of it.
What usually fuels the fun is the pure speculation attached to the wheelings and dealings and the excitement or the lament that your team is or is not involved on a particular free agent or working a blockbuster deal. While in recent years these meetings are usually dominated by the teams flush with cash (read: Yankees) every team gets involved in the rumors one way or another and a lot teams sign at least one sort of notable free agent. For instance this year the Royals, a team usually not wheeling and dealing unless its a proven MLB talent for some more prospects, has actually been at the forefront of a number of rumored deals and pursuits of free agents, even the top pitching prize Zack Greinke. Or a team like Cleveland that has sign a free agent, has been rumored to be a linchpin for some blockbuster deal involving Justin Upton to the Rangers.
Usually most big name free agents sign around this time, with a few exceptions like Prince Fielder last year. But Albert Pujols and CJ Wilson, arguably the top free agent prizes in their respective positions signed with the Angels on the same day leading to all sorts of "Who can beat the Angels now?" headlines for months. In 2010 it was the Red Sox swinging a deal for Adrian Gonzalez and then splurging on Carl Crawfor. The Hot Stove season is awesome. It allows for renewing of hope and some actual off the field excitement as there is usually a frenetic pace to free agent signings and trades. Remember the excitement that we had in free agency prior to last NFL season once the lockout was lifted? That's usually the winter meetings. But baseball has it every year.
Well this year has been terrible. Probably the worst winter meetings for player movement in recent memory. We had all the usual speculation and even a burgeoning head to head race between Texas and the Dodgers for Greinke, but then nothing happened. Hamilton is still a free agent. Greinke is still a free agent. Justin Upton is still a Diamondback. The Royals haven't traded their best prospect Wil Myers yet. The best we've had is BJ Upton going to Atlanta (a great signing) and Dan Haren going to Washington (whatever). It has been disappointing to say the least. But Jayson Stark over at espn.com wrote a interesting piece on the meetings yesterday and basically stated the Rangers have corked the flow.
The Rangers are frontrunners for Hamilton, Greinke, AND a trade for Justin Upton, although its clear they wont get all 3. But one piece has close for the others to fall into place and it's not happening. And those pieces have to fall for the market to set for other free agents and other teams move to address their needs elsewhere. While the slow pace has been disappointing, I'm stoked the Rangers are taking the lead here. Texas has been relevant for exactly 3 years of the last 10 and 6 years in its entire existence. They've made two huge splashes in the offseason prior to this run: Alex Rodriguez for 252 million and Chan Ho Park for 65 million dollars. Neither of those worked out well. Well this year we are the alpha dog. Players wait for us. Teams wait for us. I love that status. We aren't the new Yankees of the winter meetings where we come in a blow out the market by throwing unreasonable offers at players, we are a new breed of offseason dominator where we control the flow UNTIL we get what we ultimately want. While it may temper the excitement, it's great for Texas Rangers baseball. Jon Daniels our GM continues to impress and I hope he remains GM for a long time.
One NFL note before we get to last week's recap and this week's games. I've been fairly harsh on Romeo Crennel and usually a fan writes about sports to commend and/or criticize. But, we ignore the basic humanity of the players, coaches, and executives and basically write about these people as if they are legendary heroes or unrepentant criminals. I sincerely felt bad for Romeo Crennel the human being last Saturday. To watch one of your players who you've invested time and energy to help make successful kill themselves has to be one of the most mentally painful experiences in life. Romeo handled the situation with class and then went out on Sunday, the very next day, and probably coached the game of his life. The sheer level of aggressiveness struck me that Crennel wanted this game more than any other he has coached. Sure, Carolina isn't a tough matchup, but on the field Kansas City has rivaled Oakland and Arizona as clearly the worst teams in the league. Crennel went out there and coached his team to a victory. That's the highest praise you can make for any coach and I commend you Crennel. That was a great performance. There is often opportunity in tragedy and maybe something clicked in Crennel's head, because he was great last week. Good luck the rest of the season Kansas City, you didn't deserve to have this tragedy thrown on your doorstep.
Week 13 Recap
Bengals (-1.5) @ Chargers
I will say this, I am writing this without having looked at the lines, but if San Diego is only a 1.5 pt underdog to the Steelers I'm going to bankrupt Vegas. It's as if Vegas and the betting public feel like it's 2006 and LaDainian Tomlinson is setting NFL records for these Chargers. These are not the same Chargers we knew in the 00's. They are seriously devoid of talent in several areas and are simply not good. They should easily be lumped into the category of teams just above the terrible 3: Arizona, Oakland, and Kansas City. I'd love to see the Eagles and Chargers play. It would be a game of who can piss away the game last.
Buccaneers (+7) @ Broncos
1 point. Ridiculous. That bad defense caught up to them in the 3rd quarter and they just couldn't recover after a great first half or finish the cover after a great 4th quarter. I still believe in my Bucs and I think this line would've been covered on most occasions.
Browns (Pk) @ Raiders
Love it. The AFC West is clearly the worst division in football this year. You can't have the 2nd or 3rd best team in the conference and then the two clearly worst and a third that may be almost as bad. Cleveland is game folks. Be cautious with how you bet in games involving them.
Jaguars (+6) @ Bills
Whoops. I don't really know what to say except shame on me for betting on Jacksonville.
Cardinals @ Jets (-4.5)
You know what? Fuck you, Mark Sanchez. Seriously. Your ball control acumen is making Rex Grossman look like Tom Brady. Butt fumbles, horrrrrrible passes that are intercepted, 97 yards passing in 3 quarters, what the hell are you doing back there? No NFL QB should EVER be benched in favor of Greg McElroy. Greg McElroy was drafted to be a 3rd string QB. He came from a smart coaching system and his job is to wear a headset and look at a clipboard and act like a coach. His job is not to actually play football. Yet you got benched in favor of him. Just do the league a favor and retire. At least be honest with the Jets and restructure your contract so you aren't stealing 8 million guaranteed dollars from them. I can not believe the Jets at home could not cover this spread against Ryan Lindley who is somehow even more inept. When a team has 137 total yards you should win by 20, not 1. So fucking ridiculous.
And no I'm not really mad at Shonn Greene for kneeling. That would've been a backdoor cover and Shonn Greene absolutely did the right thing. It's not his fault his quarterback is the worst in the league among those who have started every game.
Bonus
49ers @ Rams (+7)
Probably shouldn't have covered, although I still think it was right call. And to every 49er fan who blew up my facebook with "I want Alex Smith back" shut up. Kaepernick didn't call a play requiring him to pitch the ball 15 yards laterally while 10 yards from his own end zone (Harbaugh), didn't drop an easy touchdown that would have made the previous play moot anyway (Delanie Walker), didn't make an egregious late hit on a sliding Bradford at the end of regulation giving the Rams 15 yards that immensely helped get the Rams in position for a game typing field goal (Dashon Goldson), or miss a game winning field goal in overtime in a dome (David Akers).
You know what Kaepernick has done though: Bring the 49ers back from down double digits against the Rams in week 10, something Alex Smith couldn't do if he wished for it from a genie; destroyed the Bears defense in Chicago; beat the Saints handily in new Orleans without requiring 5 turnovers and despite the pitch fumble last week drove the 49ers down in two plays for a go ahead field goal making plays Alex Smith simply can't. So deal with the rookei starter bumps and take comfort in the fact that he makes your offense much more explosive, and teams like the Giants are now less comfortable playing you in the playoffs.
That being said Fisher sure seems to know how to get the Rams coached up for a game against the 49ers. Harbaugh/Fisher is shaping up to be a doosy of a coaching matchup.
Week 14 Picks
Ravens @ Redskins (-2.5)
I've been kind of waiting for a line like this for the Ravens for a little while. This team has pulled so many wins out of its ass that its record is simply immaterial to betting. Their offense is miserable and their defense is at least as bad or worse than the Redskins maligned defense. Losing to Charlie Batch is inexcusable. I don't care that it was a Pittsburgh/Baltimore game and that it will just always been close. If the Ravens were anything like their actual 9-3 records that game never would've been close and they certainly would not have lost it. Meanwhile RG3 is somehow riding a wave of more confidence than he was early in the season. He has eviscerated two division opponents in back to back weeks and has completely re-energized the Washington fan base. The rule is all things being equal the home team gives 3 points. The fact the Redskins give less shows Vegas thinks Baltimore is better. At this stage of the season, they aren't.
Texans (+3.5) @ Patriots
Sure this is a Monday night game in Foxborough, but I still can not fully trust the Pats. Maybe they withheld some game plan against Miami to use on Houston, but Houston has been so solid all season no would be the least bit surprised to see them win. This is the ultimate test for both teams heading into the playoffs and I think Houston actually wins this one. I'm happy I get 3.5 and you know theyll go in a bunch of 6 pt teaserss
Lions @ Packers (-7)
Yeah they played to a 1 pt victory a couple of weeks ago (technically 4 but that last Crosby field goal doesn't count), but there is something I've figured out a little bit about this season. When teams lose very winnable games the previous week, they often no show the next week. How do the Lions even bother to get up for this game after the ridiculous way they pissed away a home game to the Indianapolis Lucks. If Rodgers goes for less than 300 and 3tds Ill be disappointed. Plus its those horrible losses that coaching really stands out. Schwartz is not a good coach.
Falcons (-3.5) @ Panthers
See above about the Lions and apply it to the Panthers. Also apply the fact that Atlanta has had some extra rest, it's a short trip and the Panthers are done. Both Houston and Atlanta get very little credit for what they've done this year. It's not often an 11-1 team gives less than 4 against a 3-9 team. Yes there are obviously pitfalls with this game most notably that Atlanta may pull out just enough to win but Carolina seems to have lost all fight and it just doesn't strike me that Panthers players are too interested in saving Ron Rivera's job.
Chiefs (+6.5) @ Browns
Yep, part of this is a Romeo Crennel appreciation pick for the way he coached last week but it goes deeper than that. Kansas City has really been game these last couple of weeks combined with Cleveland simply underwhelming. I mean does anyone trust Cleveland to beat any NFL team by 7? One week they need 8 turnovers to win by 6 and the next week they slug it out to a 3 pt win with one of the worst defenses in the league. I know I said beware of the Browns in the recap, but that was meant to apply to them as dogs. I just can not take the Browns seriously in the role of touchdown favorites. Good luck Crennel.
Last week: 2-3, Season: 33-26-1 (37-30-1 with bonus)
Good luck this week!
What usually fuels the fun is the pure speculation attached to the wheelings and dealings and the excitement or the lament that your team is or is not involved on a particular free agent or working a blockbuster deal. While in recent years these meetings are usually dominated by the teams flush with cash (read: Yankees) every team gets involved in the rumors one way or another and a lot teams sign at least one sort of notable free agent. For instance this year the Royals, a team usually not wheeling and dealing unless its a proven MLB talent for some more prospects, has actually been at the forefront of a number of rumored deals and pursuits of free agents, even the top pitching prize Zack Greinke. Or a team like Cleveland that has sign a free agent, has been rumored to be a linchpin for some blockbuster deal involving Justin Upton to the Rangers.
Usually most big name free agents sign around this time, with a few exceptions like Prince Fielder last year. But Albert Pujols and CJ Wilson, arguably the top free agent prizes in their respective positions signed with the Angels on the same day leading to all sorts of "Who can beat the Angels now?" headlines for months. In 2010 it was the Red Sox swinging a deal for Adrian Gonzalez and then splurging on Carl Crawfor. The Hot Stove season is awesome. It allows for renewing of hope and some actual off the field excitement as there is usually a frenetic pace to free agent signings and trades. Remember the excitement that we had in free agency prior to last NFL season once the lockout was lifted? That's usually the winter meetings. But baseball has it every year.
Well this year has been terrible. Probably the worst winter meetings for player movement in recent memory. We had all the usual speculation and even a burgeoning head to head race between Texas and the Dodgers for Greinke, but then nothing happened. Hamilton is still a free agent. Greinke is still a free agent. Justin Upton is still a Diamondback. The Royals haven't traded their best prospect Wil Myers yet. The best we've had is BJ Upton going to Atlanta (a great signing) and Dan Haren going to Washington (whatever). It has been disappointing to say the least. But Jayson Stark over at espn.com wrote a interesting piece on the meetings yesterday and basically stated the Rangers have corked the flow.
The Rangers are frontrunners for Hamilton, Greinke, AND a trade for Justin Upton, although its clear they wont get all 3. But one piece has close for the others to fall into place and it's not happening. And those pieces have to fall for the market to set for other free agents and other teams move to address their needs elsewhere. While the slow pace has been disappointing, I'm stoked the Rangers are taking the lead here. Texas has been relevant for exactly 3 years of the last 10 and 6 years in its entire existence. They've made two huge splashes in the offseason prior to this run: Alex Rodriguez for 252 million and Chan Ho Park for 65 million dollars. Neither of those worked out well. Well this year we are the alpha dog. Players wait for us. Teams wait for us. I love that status. We aren't the new Yankees of the winter meetings where we come in a blow out the market by throwing unreasonable offers at players, we are a new breed of offseason dominator where we control the flow UNTIL we get what we ultimately want. While it may temper the excitement, it's great for Texas Rangers baseball. Jon Daniels our GM continues to impress and I hope he remains GM for a long time.
One NFL note before we get to last week's recap and this week's games. I've been fairly harsh on Romeo Crennel and usually a fan writes about sports to commend and/or criticize. But, we ignore the basic humanity of the players, coaches, and executives and basically write about these people as if they are legendary heroes or unrepentant criminals. I sincerely felt bad for Romeo Crennel the human being last Saturday. To watch one of your players who you've invested time and energy to help make successful kill themselves has to be one of the most mentally painful experiences in life. Romeo handled the situation with class and then went out on Sunday, the very next day, and probably coached the game of his life. The sheer level of aggressiveness struck me that Crennel wanted this game more than any other he has coached. Sure, Carolina isn't a tough matchup, but on the field Kansas City has rivaled Oakland and Arizona as clearly the worst teams in the league. Crennel went out there and coached his team to a victory. That's the highest praise you can make for any coach and I commend you Crennel. That was a great performance. There is often opportunity in tragedy and maybe something clicked in Crennel's head, because he was great last week. Good luck the rest of the season Kansas City, you didn't deserve to have this tragedy thrown on your doorstep.
Week 13 Recap
Bengals (-1.5) @ Chargers
I will say this, I am writing this without having looked at the lines, but if San Diego is only a 1.5 pt underdog to the Steelers I'm going to bankrupt Vegas. It's as if Vegas and the betting public feel like it's 2006 and LaDainian Tomlinson is setting NFL records for these Chargers. These are not the same Chargers we knew in the 00's. They are seriously devoid of talent in several areas and are simply not good. They should easily be lumped into the category of teams just above the terrible 3: Arizona, Oakland, and Kansas City. I'd love to see the Eagles and Chargers play. It would be a game of who can piss away the game last.
Buccaneers (+7) @ Broncos
1 point. Ridiculous. That bad defense caught up to them in the 3rd quarter and they just couldn't recover after a great first half or finish the cover after a great 4th quarter. I still believe in my Bucs and I think this line would've been covered on most occasions.
Browns (Pk) @ Raiders
Love it. The AFC West is clearly the worst division in football this year. You can't have the 2nd or 3rd best team in the conference and then the two clearly worst and a third that may be almost as bad. Cleveland is game folks. Be cautious with how you bet in games involving them.
Jaguars (+6) @ Bills
Whoops. I don't really know what to say except shame on me for betting on Jacksonville.
Cardinals @ Jets (-4.5)
You know what? Fuck you, Mark Sanchez. Seriously. Your ball control acumen is making Rex Grossman look like Tom Brady. Butt fumbles, horrrrrrible passes that are intercepted, 97 yards passing in 3 quarters, what the hell are you doing back there? No NFL QB should EVER be benched in favor of Greg McElroy. Greg McElroy was drafted to be a 3rd string QB. He came from a smart coaching system and his job is to wear a headset and look at a clipboard and act like a coach. His job is not to actually play football. Yet you got benched in favor of him. Just do the league a favor and retire. At least be honest with the Jets and restructure your contract so you aren't stealing 8 million guaranteed dollars from them. I can not believe the Jets at home could not cover this spread against Ryan Lindley who is somehow even more inept. When a team has 137 total yards you should win by 20, not 1. So fucking ridiculous.
And no I'm not really mad at Shonn Greene for kneeling. That would've been a backdoor cover and Shonn Greene absolutely did the right thing. It's not his fault his quarterback is the worst in the league among those who have started every game.
Bonus
49ers @ Rams (+7)
Probably shouldn't have covered, although I still think it was right call. And to every 49er fan who blew up my facebook with "I want Alex Smith back" shut up. Kaepernick didn't call a play requiring him to pitch the ball 15 yards laterally while 10 yards from his own end zone (Harbaugh), didn't drop an easy touchdown that would have made the previous play moot anyway (Delanie Walker), didn't make an egregious late hit on a sliding Bradford at the end of regulation giving the Rams 15 yards that immensely helped get the Rams in position for a game typing field goal (Dashon Goldson), or miss a game winning field goal in overtime in a dome (David Akers).
You know what Kaepernick has done though: Bring the 49ers back from down double digits against the Rams in week 10, something Alex Smith couldn't do if he wished for it from a genie; destroyed the Bears defense in Chicago; beat the Saints handily in new Orleans without requiring 5 turnovers and despite the pitch fumble last week drove the 49ers down in two plays for a go ahead field goal making plays Alex Smith simply can't. So deal with the rookei starter bumps and take comfort in the fact that he makes your offense much more explosive, and teams like the Giants are now less comfortable playing you in the playoffs.
That being said Fisher sure seems to know how to get the Rams coached up for a game against the 49ers. Harbaugh/Fisher is shaping up to be a doosy of a coaching matchup.
Week 14 Picks
Ravens @ Redskins (-2.5)
I've been kind of waiting for a line like this for the Ravens for a little while. This team has pulled so many wins out of its ass that its record is simply immaterial to betting. Their offense is miserable and their defense is at least as bad or worse than the Redskins maligned defense. Losing to Charlie Batch is inexcusable. I don't care that it was a Pittsburgh/Baltimore game and that it will just always been close. If the Ravens were anything like their actual 9-3 records that game never would've been close and they certainly would not have lost it. Meanwhile RG3 is somehow riding a wave of more confidence than he was early in the season. He has eviscerated two division opponents in back to back weeks and has completely re-energized the Washington fan base. The rule is all things being equal the home team gives 3 points. The fact the Redskins give less shows Vegas thinks Baltimore is better. At this stage of the season, they aren't.
Texans (+3.5) @ Patriots
Sure this is a Monday night game in Foxborough, but I still can not fully trust the Pats. Maybe they withheld some game plan against Miami to use on Houston, but Houston has been so solid all season no would be the least bit surprised to see them win. This is the ultimate test for both teams heading into the playoffs and I think Houston actually wins this one. I'm happy I get 3.5 and you know theyll go in a bunch of 6 pt teaserss
Lions @ Packers (-7)
Yeah they played to a 1 pt victory a couple of weeks ago (technically 4 but that last Crosby field goal doesn't count), but there is something I've figured out a little bit about this season. When teams lose very winnable games the previous week, they often no show the next week. How do the Lions even bother to get up for this game after the ridiculous way they pissed away a home game to the Indianapolis Lucks. If Rodgers goes for less than 300 and 3tds Ill be disappointed. Plus its those horrible losses that coaching really stands out. Schwartz is not a good coach.
Falcons (-3.5) @ Panthers
See above about the Lions and apply it to the Panthers. Also apply the fact that Atlanta has had some extra rest, it's a short trip and the Panthers are done. Both Houston and Atlanta get very little credit for what they've done this year. It's not often an 11-1 team gives less than 4 against a 3-9 team. Yes there are obviously pitfalls with this game most notably that Atlanta may pull out just enough to win but Carolina seems to have lost all fight and it just doesn't strike me that Panthers players are too interested in saving Ron Rivera's job.
Chiefs (+6.5) @ Browns
Yep, part of this is a Romeo Crennel appreciation pick for the way he coached last week but it goes deeper than that. Kansas City has really been game these last couple of weeks combined with Cleveland simply underwhelming. I mean does anyone trust Cleveland to beat any NFL team by 7? One week they need 8 turnovers to win by 6 and the next week they slug it out to a 3 pt win with one of the worst defenses in the league. I know I said beware of the Browns in the recap, but that was meant to apply to them as dogs. I just can not take the Browns seriously in the role of touchdown favorites. Good luck Crennel.
Bonus
Jets @ Jaguars (+2.5)
This is the dumbest game in the world to bet on, so please don't. That being said I found it entirely too funny that there was a game that involved a team I have decided to check out on (Jax) and a team that will be lead AGAIN by Mark Sanchez. How can he have any confidence at this point? The Jags are hurting going down to some 4th string running back who is kind of a fullback and their best WR Cecil Shorts has been ruled out, but I don't care. The second Rex Ryan said gimme some more Sanchez, I had to pick against them in the bonus. What a terrible game, but may offer quite a bit of unintentional comedy. I really try to stay away from O/Us but its currently 38.5 for this game. It could be 28.5 and I'd probably still want the under. Awesome.
Good luck this week!
Friday, November 30, 2012
Gator Grumblings and Supercontest Week 13
Some of us are way too invested in sports. I make my living as a lawyer while daydreaming I could actually find a way to turn my vast sports knowledge and above average (admit it, it's true I'm fairly accurate compared to guys who get paid to do this) analyses into a career that would actually give me joy. I love sports. I love sports the way MTV junkies love The Real World or Jersey Shore. I simply can not get enough. I love playing them, in my life so far I have competitively played in some kind of organized league or tournament or competition in the following sports with varying levels of success: baseball, old man softball, tackle football, flag football, cross-country/distance running, track and field, basketball, soccer, racquetball, and darts. Yeah I added that last one as a joke, but whatever it's on ESPN2 at 2am sometimes and I have actually played in numerous leagues and would likely crush you at that "sport". I also golf, but haven't played in a tournament...yet. I love the competition. I love watching professionals and semi-pros (read: college athletes) do it better than I can. I love debating with anyone that can stand to listen to me for 5 minutes. I love playing fantasy sports.
But over the last few years as I approached and turned 30 I felt like I had been less emotional about my sports and the teams I cheered for. I suffered one of the all time gut punches as a fan in the 2011 World Series. I mean we are talking on level with the Buckner series in 1986. You are never one strike away from winning the World Series twice in separate innings and lose. After that game I was fairly despondent but still optimistic with Game 7 to follow. Even after losing Game 7, I only needed about an hour or so of alone time to come to grips with what i just experienced over the last two days. Put this in stark contrast to when I was 12 and Cowboys lost the NFC Championship game to the hated 49ers. I was so angry and crying on my way home while riding my bike I didn't notice some gravel and crashed my bike. I have the scar on my wrist from that day still. I didn't think at this point I could feel the same way, but after Notre Dame's win on Saturday night at USC and realization that Notre Dame was going to be the #1 team in the country heading into the bowl season I was about as fired up about sports as I have been in forever.
A lot of this stems from the fact that the Gators were going to backdoor their way into the National Championship game with a loss from Notre Dame at USC. And yes, I am in full agreement that this portion of my angst should be a non-factor, since if Florida decided to actually play their normal game against Georgia instead of turning the ball over 6 times and still only losing by 8, we wouldn't have been in that situation on Saturday night needing a mediocre USC team to win. I understand that, and really I'm not THAT mad the Gators aren't playing in the national championship game. They should have beat Georgia and I honestly think they would have beat Alabama this weekend. The blueprint was out on them and two teams that Florida beat this year (A&M and LSU) either beat Bama or gave away a victory by playing 15 yards off the ball against a QB that can only throw accurately on short routes, notwithstanding wide open receivers against a shitty Auburn secondary. But that's simply an alternate reality. What I am mad about is actual reality.
Notre Dame #1. What a disgusting proposition. It's amazing that a system that requires human input has Notre Dame as a unanimous #1. There is something severely robotic and fraudulent about the polling. 12-0 equals #1. No questions asked. No observations considered, no data inspected. If you are 12-0 and no one else is you must be the best team in the country. This is the biggest crock of shit I have ever seen. There is no rule that states you must vote the only 12-0 team #1. Isn't the purpose of this poll to actually vote for who you think the best team in the country is? But there it sits. All 60 voters of the AP Top 25 poll have Notre Dame number 1. At least 3 people in the Coaches poll have some idea of what they are doing splitting their votes between Georgia and Alabama.
You know what's so stupid about the AP poll? A majority of these same voters (who are writers and broadcasters) will assuredly pick the SEC champ to beat Notre Dame in the title game. How can you not? The SEC has never lost to anyone outside the SEC in the BCS title game (8-1 all time, with the 1 loss being LSU to Alabama last year) If that's the case why is Notre Dame #1? The stupid 12-0 next their name? It's unreal. This is how I feel about it right now: CRAZY PILLS
Why can't these voters use the things in front of them? Notre Dame has two wins all year that could be considered "impressive". A controversial win against Stanford @ home in overtime where Stanford was denied the tying touchdown, and the real feather in the cap: @ Norman against Oklahoma. But let's face it, even mediocre teams can show up with impressive wins every season: Baylor against K State, NC State @ Florida State, Washington against Stanford, etc.. What is more telling about Notre Dame's season are the unimpressive wins: by 3 @ home to BYU, by 3 @ home to Purdue, 3OT @ home to Pitt, in game that Pitt completely gave away in OT, 21-6 against a 2-10 Boston College team. They could only beat a USC team with a redshirt QB making his first state and possessing one of the worst defenses in the Pac-12 by 9. Oregon and UCLA beat them by more and USC lost to an unheralded Arizona team. This is not the resume of the #1 team in the country. If this was college basketball their RPI would be like 18. What about Notre Dame this year leads anyone to believe that are the best? All it is is a robotic response to a win-loss record.
If you put this question to the 60 AP voters: Who would win at the Orange Bowl this year, Notre Dame or _____? I'm positive the majority would come out in favor of the following fill-ins for that blank: Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Oregon, LSU, Kansas State, Texas A&M, maybe Stanford and maybe South Carolina. I think you could draw the line at Nebraska and Oklahoma and the ACC rivals Florida State and Clemson. I would be fine putting Notre Dame somewhere in the 8-14 range. Yet despite this all 60 voted Notre Dame as the #1 team in the country.
A valid argument could be made for Florida to be the #1 team. They went 11-1, their only loss a completely out of character 6 turnover game that they still were in until the end. They beat 4 of the top 13 teams in the country, lost to the #3 team, and beat two teams that took it to the #2 team. No one has an onfield resume even close to that. They punctuated it by crushing the #10 team in the country on the road. You know what, they have an even better resume than Alabama (loss to #3 neutral field v. loss to #9 @ home), but for some reason Alabama is #2 because the media jocks Nick Saban. Whatever.
The worst thing is that the currently devised playoff doesn't cure this problem. I don't think Notre Dame is one of the best 4 teams in the country but they would have gotten in. Nothing but intellectually honest voters will cure this problem. Not voters that will vote one team #1 because of their record without looking at the onfield performance but then pick against them in the national title game. Hypocrites.
And this is why I have this blog, for when I really feel passionate about something in sports. Sure making supercontest picks every week is fun, but these emotions are what really drive me as a sports fan, even negative ones that I still can't shake several days later. Nothing would satisfy me more than the SEC champ absolutely waxing the floor with Notre Dame. Guess I'll have to wait about 40 days for that to happen. On to the picks!
Week 12 Recap
Bills @ Colts (-3)
Bengals (-1.5) @ Chargers
I feel like Bill Murray from Groundhog day. I keep waking up to the same spread scenarios. The Bengals are in a big push for the playoffs and are playing some of their best football recently against the Giants and cellar dwelling Chiefs and Raiders. The Chargers aren't much better than either of their AFC West counterparts. So why is this spread 1.5? Are we going to expect the same no show from another AFC North oppinent? Did the Chargers fix their myriad offensive issues? Did Norv learn how to coach? The answer to all of those is NO.
Buccaneers (+7) @ Broncos
This may be an unpopular pick since it does send Tampa on the road in an unfriendly atmosphere against a red-hot Broncos team, but the Bucs haven't lost a game by more than 7 all year and they have more than enough offense to keep up with Denver. I'm not saying Denver isn't for real, I think they have a good shot to make a deep playoff run but their recent 6 game winning includes San Diego x2, Carolina, Kansas City, and an actual fraudulent team in New Orleans. I just think 7 might be too high here. Also it's nice to be betting with my sweethearts again.
Browns (Pk) @ Raiders
Sexy, sexy matchup. Thank god for the Redzone channel or i'd be force to watch this snoozefest. Yeah, this is also how bad the card is this week that this is my #3 game. Simply put the Browns are playing better than the Raiders. Nothing more to really evaluate. Now where is the Chiefs game so I can pick against all 4 AFC West teams?
Jaguars (+6) @ Bills
Yeah this one actually does have some more appeal, both teams have fairly potent offenses with defenses that leave something to be desired. Since Henne has stepped in Jacksonville has looked like a passing juggernaut. Who would've thought that Blaine Gabbert wasn't the answer in Jacksonville? I fully expect Tannehill to be a victim of these similar circumstances next year. What a waste of a first round pick. As for this game, the old mantra don't guive more than 3 with mediocre teams applies here. Could Buffalo win by 7? Sure. But more likely they lose or win by 4 or less.
Cardinals @ Jets (-4.5)
Yuck. This game is horrible and that spread is horrible. But Whisenhunt is trying to get himself fired by sticking with Ryan Lindley over Skelton. Kolb may return, but there hasn't been any positive news on that front this week. The Jets like to do the Jekyll and Hyde routine, look terrible one week then beat a team good the next week. This is a perfect scenario for that to happen, I just wish I didn't have to give 4.5.
Bonus
49ers @ Rams (+7)
Back to back road games for the 49ers and of course we all remember how fired up the Rams were for this game last time they met. The 49ers also needed some help from a couple of interception returns to put away the Saints. I don't like Amendola in a walking boot, but I also just don't like giving 7 with the 49ers. Kinda odd having a bonus in a week where I hate the card, but I haven't had a bonus in a couple of weeks.
Last week: 3-1-1, Season: 31-23-1 (34-27-1 with bonus)
Good luck everyone!
![]() |
| Cue Nancy Kerrigan: Whhhhhhhyyyyyyyy?????? |
But over the last few years as I approached and turned 30 I felt like I had been less emotional about my sports and the teams I cheered for. I suffered one of the all time gut punches as a fan in the 2011 World Series. I mean we are talking on level with the Buckner series in 1986. You are never one strike away from winning the World Series twice in separate innings and lose. After that game I was fairly despondent but still optimistic with Game 7 to follow. Even after losing Game 7, I only needed about an hour or so of alone time to come to grips with what i just experienced over the last two days. Put this in stark contrast to when I was 12 and Cowboys lost the NFC Championship game to the hated 49ers. I was so angry and crying on my way home while riding my bike I didn't notice some gravel and crashed my bike. I have the scar on my wrist from that day still. I didn't think at this point I could feel the same way, but after Notre Dame's win on Saturday night at USC and realization that Notre Dame was going to be the #1 team in the country heading into the bowl season I was about as fired up about sports as I have been in forever.
![]() |
| Despite winning the previous two Super Bowls, this game hurt as bad as any I had experienced in my short fandom. |
A lot of this stems from the fact that the Gators were going to backdoor their way into the National Championship game with a loss from Notre Dame at USC. And yes, I am in full agreement that this portion of my angst should be a non-factor, since if Florida decided to actually play their normal game against Georgia instead of turning the ball over 6 times and still only losing by 8, we wouldn't have been in that situation on Saturday night needing a mediocre USC team to win. I understand that, and really I'm not THAT mad the Gators aren't playing in the national championship game. They should have beat Georgia and I honestly think they would have beat Alabama this weekend. The blueprint was out on them and two teams that Florida beat this year (A&M and LSU) either beat Bama or gave away a victory by playing 15 yards off the ball against a QB that can only throw accurately on short routes, notwithstanding wide open receivers against a shitty Auburn secondary. But that's simply an alternate reality. What I am mad about is actual reality.
![]() |
| I guess it's alright if YOU think you're #1, Manti. But no one else. |
Notre Dame #1. What a disgusting proposition. It's amazing that a system that requires human input has Notre Dame as a unanimous #1. There is something severely robotic and fraudulent about the polling. 12-0 equals #1. No questions asked. No observations considered, no data inspected. If you are 12-0 and no one else is you must be the best team in the country. This is the biggest crock of shit I have ever seen. There is no rule that states you must vote the only 12-0 team #1. Isn't the purpose of this poll to actually vote for who you think the best team in the country is? But there it sits. All 60 voters of the AP Top 25 poll have Notre Dame number 1. At least 3 people in the Coaches poll have some idea of what they are doing splitting their votes between Georgia and Alabama.
You know what's so stupid about the AP poll? A majority of these same voters (who are writers and broadcasters) will assuredly pick the SEC champ to beat Notre Dame in the title game. How can you not? The SEC has never lost to anyone outside the SEC in the BCS title game (8-1 all time, with the 1 loss being LSU to Alabama last year) If that's the case why is Notre Dame #1? The stupid 12-0 next their name? It's unreal. This is how I feel about it right now: CRAZY PILLS
Why can't these voters use the things in front of them? Notre Dame has two wins all year that could be considered "impressive". A controversial win against Stanford @ home in overtime where Stanford was denied the tying touchdown, and the real feather in the cap: @ Norman against Oklahoma. But let's face it, even mediocre teams can show up with impressive wins every season: Baylor against K State, NC State @ Florida State, Washington against Stanford, etc.. What is more telling about Notre Dame's season are the unimpressive wins: by 3 @ home to BYU, by 3 @ home to Purdue, 3OT @ home to Pitt, in game that Pitt completely gave away in OT, 21-6 against a 2-10 Boston College team. They could only beat a USC team with a redshirt QB making his first state and possessing one of the worst defenses in the Pac-12 by 9. Oregon and UCLA beat them by more and USC lost to an unheralded Arizona team. This is not the resume of the #1 team in the country. If this was college basketball their RPI would be like 18. What about Notre Dame this year leads anyone to believe that are the best? All it is is a robotic response to a win-loss record.
If you put this question to the 60 AP voters: Who would win at the Orange Bowl this year, Notre Dame or _____? I'm positive the majority would come out in favor of the following fill-ins for that blank: Alabama, Georgia, Florida, Oregon, LSU, Kansas State, Texas A&M, maybe Stanford and maybe South Carolina. I think you could draw the line at Nebraska and Oklahoma and the ACC rivals Florida State and Clemson. I would be fine putting Notre Dame somewhere in the 8-14 range. Yet despite this all 60 voted Notre Dame as the #1 team in the country.
![]() |
| What could have been... |
A valid argument could be made for Florida to be the #1 team. They went 11-1, their only loss a completely out of character 6 turnover game that they still were in until the end. They beat 4 of the top 13 teams in the country, lost to the #3 team, and beat two teams that took it to the #2 team. No one has an onfield resume even close to that. They punctuated it by crushing the #10 team in the country on the road. You know what, they have an even better resume than Alabama (loss to #3 neutral field v. loss to #9 @ home), but for some reason Alabama is #2 because the media jocks Nick Saban. Whatever.
The worst thing is that the currently devised playoff doesn't cure this problem. I don't think Notre Dame is one of the best 4 teams in the country but they would have gotten in. Nothing but intellectually honest voters will cure this problem. Not voters that will vote one team #1 because of their record without looking at the onfield performance but then pick against them in the national title game. Hypocrites.
And this is why I have this blog, for when I really feel passionate about something in sports. Sure making supercontest picks every week is fun, but these emotions are what really drive me as a sports fan, even negative ones that I still can't shake several days later. Nothing would satisfy me more than the SEC champ absolutely waxing the floor with Notre Dame. Guess I'll have to wait about 40 days for that to happen. On to the picks!
Week 12 Recap
This one was close and yet never really in doubt the whole way. For once I nailed the Chuck Pagano karma train. I do feel a little sleazy basing spread picks on the presence of a man fighting leukemia, but the Colts show up every time something Chuckstrong related happens. This week? Two cheerleaders shaving their heads on the sidelines during the game in solidarity with Chuck. Buffalo didn't stand a chance after that. Also Indy is AFC Seattle, good at home bad on the road.
Packers (+3) @ Giants
Hahaha. Stupid Giants. I totally forgot that the "nobody believes in us" card was legitimate again for this team. They absolutely dominated this game after a lot pundits really felt Green Bay had made itself the team to beat again. I should have seen this coming, shame on me. At least it's the only blemish on this week's card.
Seahawks @ Dolphins (+3)
Seattle just looked really flat this game. I love the fact that NO ONE was taking Miami in this game. I think you could get -3 at +105. That's about as good of odds as you can get on a spread before the line moves. Like my Giants pick and their nobody believes in us crap, betting America failed to take into account actual betting rules that apply to the Seahawks: West coast travelling to East Coast for morning game AND Seattle sucks on the road. I feel good about this one.
Ravens (-1) @ Chargers
I haven't said this out loud to anyone but I don't think Ray Rice actually got there on 4th and 29. But who cares? This result was simply not surprising for the Chargers. In control the entire first half they get shut out in the second half by a team not entirely motivated to win. And then the 4th and 29. See ya Norv! If he survives this season I don't know whether to call him Michael Myers from Halloween or Zombie Norv. There is no way he sticks around after last week.
Falcons (-1) @ Buccaneers
Everything in life must have a balance. I can't get a miracle Packers cover last week and expect the exact same cover the following week with the Falcons. Matt Bryant had a shot at the end of the game to make this a 4 point win, instead he missed, giving me my first push of the season. C'est la vie.
Before I start this week's picks I just want to post a link to a new blog started as a collaboration between myself and a my friend Teach. You can see it over here at Straight Pickin' Ya. Pretty neat little spread pick 'em blog. Teach will be selecting 3 games each week in NBA, NCAA Basketball, and NCAA Football as well as my 5 game Supercontest slate and we will each give our takes and picks on the season. Check it out!
Week 13 Picks
(Ed. Note: This is the first week I've had a full slate to pick from, minus the Thursday game, and it was one of the hardest weeks to make picks. I'm bracing for my first 0-5.)
I feel like Bill Murray from Groundhog day. I keep waking up to the same spread scenarios. The Bengals are in a big push for the playoffs and are playing some of their best football recently against the Giants and cellar dwelling Chiefs and Raiders. The Chargers aren't much better than either of their AFC West counterparts. So why is this spread 1.5? Are we going to expect the same no show from another AFC North oppinent? Did the Chargers fix their myriad offensive issues? Did Norv learn how to coach? The answer to all of those is NO.
Buccaneers (+7) @ Broncos
This may be an unpopular pick since it does send Tampa on the road in an unfriendly atmosphere against a red-hot Broncos team, but the Bucs haven't lost a game by more than 7 all year and they have more than enough offense to keep up with Denver. I'm not saying Denver isn't for real, I think they have a good shot to make a deep playoff run but their recent 6 game winning includes San Diego x2, Carolina, Kansas City, and an actual fraudulent team in New Orleans. I just think 7 might be too high here. Also it's nice to be betting with my sweethearts again.
Browns (Pk) @ Raiders
Sexy, sexy matchup. Thank god for the Redzone channel or i'd be force to watch this snoozefest. Yeah, this is also how bad the card is this week that this is my #3 game. Simply put the Browns are playing better than the Raiders. Nothing more to really evaluate. Now where is the Chiefs game so I can pick against all 4 AFC West teams?
Jaguars (+6) @ Bills
Yeah this one actually does have some more appeal, both teams have fairly potent offenses with defenses that leave something to be desired. Since Henne has stepped in Jacksonville has looked like a passing juggernaut. Who would've thought that Blaine Gabbert wasn't the answer in Jacksonville? I fully expect Tannehill to be a victim of these similar circumstances next year. What a waste of a first round pick. As for this game, the old mantra don't guive more than 3 with mediocre teams applies here. Could Buffalo win by 7? Sure. But more likely they lose or win by 4 or less.
Cardinals @ Jets (-4.5)
Yuck. This game is horrible and that spread is horrible. But Whisenhunt is trying to get himself fired by sticking with Ryan Lindley over Skelton. Kolb may return, but there hasn't been any positive news on that front this week. The Jets like to do the Jekyll and Hyde routine, look terrible one week then beat a team good the next week. This is a perfect scenario for that to happen, I just wish I didn't have to give 4.5.
Bonus
49ers @ Rams (+7)
Back to back road games for the 49ers and of course we all remember how fired up the Rams were for this game last time they met. The 49ers also needed some help from a couple of interception returns to put away the Saints. I don't like Amendola in a walking boot, but I also just don't like giving 7 with the 49ers. Kinda odd having a bonus in a week where I hate the card, but I haven't had a bonus in a couple of weeks.
Good luck everyone!
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)











